I think it's too early to say it's coming to an end, he's still on the roster. I think it's more of a, "we'll see at the end of the season" type deal. I agree that picking up the option made no sense, I think it was a reporter just trying to make a story when there obviously wasn't one.soflavike wrote:I'm glad the Ponder experiment is coming to an end. Paying him close to $10 Million for a 5th year simply made zero sense. I wish him well, wherever he ends up and whenever the Vikes release him. Time to look forward and find our QB of the future. Cassell will do in the short-term.
Decision on Ponder's option may not be easy
Moderator: Moderators
Re: Decision on Ponder's option may not be easy
Re: Decision on Ponder's option may not be easy
There's always that possibility, but like you say, the option made no sense. If he's kept around for 2015 it will almost certainly be in a backup role, and you don't pay a backup QB $10M.S197 wrote:I think it's too early to say it's coming to an end, he's still on the roster. I think it's more of a, "we'll see at the end of the season" type deal. I agree that picking up the option made no sense, I think it was a reporter just trying to make a story when there obviously wasn't one.
And he has to remain after two NFL drafts, which could be the real killer. If the Vikings draft a Mettenberger or a McCarron in the 3rd round, they will be drafting a QB again in 2015, almost guaranteed. Cassel will still be under contract in 2015. The chances of Ponder sticking with the Vikings just get slimmer and slimmer.
Re: Decision on Ponder's option may not be easy
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap200000 ... ring-draftGeneral manager Rick Spielman told reporters Tuesday that the team has no plans to shop the quarterback during this week's draft.
"We wouldn't trade Ponder," Spielman said. "... That would leave us one quarterback. I would not do that, we're gonna need two quarterbacks."
Spielman also told the room that bypassing Ponder's option was more about leaving "all our options going forward, especially financially going into next year."
Re: Decision on Ponder's option may not be easy
Of course he wouldn't trade him, nobody would want him. 

-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3565
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm
Re: Decision on Ponder's option may not be easy
Come back player of the year 

Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Re: Decision on Ponder's option may not be easy
Boon wrote: I have a better chance of marrying shakira........
So you're saying there's a chance!

Re: Decision on Ponder's option may not be easy
Boon wrote: I have a better chance of marrying shakira........
The light switch IS off in Ponder's head.

- Texas Vike
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4673
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Decision on Ponder's option may not be easy
Boon wrote: I have a better chance of marrying shakira........
Her hips don't lie, unlike Spielman's mouth.

-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3565
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm
Re: Decision on Ponder's option may not be easy
You are probably right. He is no Joe WebbWebbfann wrote:
The light switch IS off in Ponder's head.If it somehow turned on then what? He'd raise his game and become barely tolerable all the time instead of just some of the time?

2011 Minnesota Vikings 11 63 34 54.0 5.7 376 6.0 34.2 3 4.8 2 3.2 36 4 0 3 21 74.6
2010 Minnesota Vikings 5 89 54 60.7 17.8 477 5.4 95.4 0 0.0 3 3.4 46 4 1 8 48 60.9
TOTAL 33 152 88 57.9 4.6 853 5.6 25.8 3 2.0 5 3.3 46 8 1 11 69 66.6
Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Re: Decision on Ponder's option may not be easy
Purple bruise wrote:
You are probably right. He is no Joe WebbHere is Webb's stats by the way. 3tds./ 5 ints. and a 66.6 QBR.
2011 Minnesota Vikings 11 63 34 54.0 5.7 376 6.0 34.2 3 4.8 2 3.2 36 4 0 3 21 74.6
2010 Minnesota Vikings 5 89 54 60.7 17.8 477 5.4 95.4 0 0.0 3 3.4 46 4 1 8 48 60.9
TOTAL 33 152 88 57.9 4.6 853 5.6 25.8 3 2.0 5 3.3 46 8 1 11 69 66.6
Whoa, not very good, even for a guy with only 5 NFL starts. He'll certainly never be a serviceable NFL QB with a start like that!
So whose first 7 game stats are these?
started Record completions att % --- TD INT Rate
7 --------- 1-6 -------- 95 ----197 48.2 --6 --9 55.4
-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3565
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm
Re: Decision on Ponder's option may not be easy
I am not sure but I bet it was someone like Joe Montana, Troy Aikman or Brett Favre and I am betting that you will make some comparison of Webb to themWebbfann wrote:
Whoa, not very good, even for a guy with only 5 NFL starts. He'll certainly never be a serviceable NFL QB with a start like that!
So whose first 7 game stats are these?
started Record completions att % --- TD INT Rate
7 --------- 1-6 -------- 95 ----197 48.2 --6 --9 55.4

Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Re: Decision on Ponder's option may not be easy
Purple bruise wrote: I am not sure but I bet it was someone like Joe Montana, Troy Aikman or Brett Favre and I am betting that you will make some comparison of Webb to them
The only comparison between the two are those statistics, which prove only that you can't judge someone's NFL career on 7 starts, or 5 like you were doing.