Vikings Message Board.Com

Pepper2Moss wrote:Chris Cook & Josh Robinson are the worst corners in the league.

Yeah. They really do choke a lot.

Why is Josh Robinson starting? He isn't good.

Orion wrote:god that stupid holding penalty killed the vikings

What was that on? Like a 3rd and 20 that wound up being a coverage sack?

Brutal penalty.

Just Me wrote:Robinson got beat for the TD. What a surprise.

It was a pick play. there wasn't much he could do. he read it but he couldn't get through traffic to prevent the completion. Nice play design by the Panthers...

Orion wrote:god that stupid holding penalty killed the vikings

Exacty. They had them stopped.

How many commercial breaks have they had in the first quarter? Like 50?

we seriously need to aggressivly go after 2 Corners in FA. you can win in the NFL without Good corners

yezzir wrote:Why is Josh Robinson starting? He isn't good.

He is the most targeted secondary player in the league and statistically makes a strong
case for being the worst secondary player in football.

He must be Frazier's guy.

Those pointsw can be blamed on our secondary. They missed or screwed the pooch on every critical play

Orion wrote:god that stupid holding penalty killed the vikings

This. They were off the field had Cook not thrown Smith to the ground.

Mothman wrote: It was a pick play. there wasn't much he could do. he read it but he couldn't get through traffic to prevent the completion. Nice play design by the Panthers...

Are you really making excuses for him......... are you his brother or something

justinkendle wrote:i knew right when i saw asher allen covering steve smith they would score

???????

Jeffbleedspurple wrote:Ate up lot of the clock also on that drive...

Tons of clock. If you're the Panthers and can get away with going for it on 4th down all the time, can't dream up a better way to easily win on the road than that.

Vikes badly need a sustained drive of their own here.

Hunter Morrow wrote: What was that on? Like a 3rd and 20 that wound up being a coverage sack?

Brutal penalty.

More of a blitz than a coverage sack.

Hunter Morrow wrote: What was that on? Like a 3rd and 20 that wound up being a coverage sack?

Brutal penalty.

It was on a blitz, but it was still a brutal penalty.