Purple bruise wrote: Are you two related![]()


Moderator: Moderators
Purple bruise wrote: Are you two related![]()
His college days are a big part of why I'm so excited about him too. He's basically a king here in Louisville. Everyone loves Teddy, even the UofK fans. A lot of Vikings converts in Kentucky these days.Jordysghost wrote: Despite my somewhat lofty expectations of Bridgewater (Mostly due to my following of his College career)I think your last line really hits the mark.
More at the link.Teddy Bridgewater’s statistics remain largely unremarkable, in the context of this league with so many established and elite quarterbacks.
The Minnesota Vikings entered their bye week next-to-last in the NFL with 165 yards passing per game, less than half of what league leader New England has produced. Through the season’s first quarter, Bridgewater has lost an NFL-most 113 yards on 13 sacks. In 16 career starts, he’s 8-8 with 16 touchdown passes.
There’s no quantification for composure, though. That’s a category Bridgewater has proven to be plenty qualified in.
“Oh, Teddy’s a warrior,” left guard Brandon Fusco said.
Pulling too many positives from a loss in this league can be a pointless exercise, given how few games exist to put such development to use. But the Vikings saw value in a 23-20 defeat at Denver against perhaps the NFL’s best defense.
Down 13-0 midway through the second quarter, the Vikings made a game of it in one of the most difficult stadiums in the league for visitors. Their rally was led by their 22-year-old baby face of the franchise.
What are you referring to above? I don't see anybody here "blasting" Bridgewater. If you have a specific point or person to respond to, please do so but the post above reads like you're jousting at windmills. It's confusing.PurpleKoolaid wrote:Andy Dalton is getting all kinds of praise this year. Finally. After year of below par playing at QB. Guess what, the Bengals gave the guy a decent line. Rick et al havent given Teddy, well, crap. Teddy behind the Bengals Oline, and he would have amasing stats. Maybe when folks are blasting teddy, try showing him a tiny bit of love, at least till we have an average Oline. We didnt even have good starters before some of the guys got hurt. My Lord, not even 1 full year under the kids belt. And other players get 3 years before all this crap.
Not worth it. Keep making you personal attacks with the Don Quixote references.Mothman wrote: What are you referring to above? I don't see anybody here "blasting" Bridgewater. If you have a specific point or person to respond to, please do so but the post above reads like you're jousting at windmills. It's confusing.
There's no doubt Bridgewater would benefit from better blocking up front. Any QB can benefit from good pass protection.
You probably should have given a trigger warning before you mentioned Don Quixote Jim. Clearly a micro aggression!PurpleKoolaid wrote: Not worth it. Keep making you personal attacks with the Don Quixote references.
What isn't considered a micro aggression these days? We're living in strange times.fiestavike wrote:You probably should have given a trigger warning before you mentioned Don Quixote Jim. Clearly a micro aggression!
I was literally just about to post this same article!CbusVikesFan wrote:http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... pportunity
This article is nothing really a Vikings fan didn't already know but it's Friday, you ain't got no job......
That was a good read. Thanks for the link.CbusVikesFan wrote:http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... pportunity
This article is nothing really a Vikings fan didn't already know but it's Friday, you ain't got no job......
Earlier in the article, Jeffri Chadiha wrote:Most importantly, it's time to discover just how ready Teddy Bridgewater is to do more than simply manage games. It's time to see how prepared he is to do the things that separate the great quarterbacks in this league from the ordinary ones.
I understand why Zimmer answered as he did but the answer to his question is "not enough". They're ranked 23rd in points per game and they're 2-2, not 4-0. Logically, getting more points and production out of their passing game could help them improve their record and ranking.They've also got a defensive-minded head coach in Mike Zimmer who, when asked about the importance of the Vikings establishing more balance between a passing attack that ranks last in the league and a running game that ranks second, said, "How are we in scoring points per game? That's what we care about."
It's a fair stance to take, but the Vikings also didn't just use a first-round pick on Bridgewater to watch him hand off to Peterson (Bridgewater only has two touchdown passes in four games). They took him because he had the chance to do some special things for this franchise. That's one reason why this upcoming stretch of games is so pivotal to both the Vikings and Bridgewater's development. This is the first real opportunity we'll have to see how he does when his team can make a statement.